T-GA FUEL DISPENSER

T-GA FUEL DISPENSER

Pump Type: Optional

Inlet Pressure :>=54kPa.

Flow rate (L/min.) :55±5

Suction Distance (m): 6(verticalmente) / 50(orizzontalmente)

FlowMeter Type : Optional

Accuracy : ±0.2%

Motor Voltage(V) :110V/220V/380V,50Hz/60Hz

Capacity(hp) :1HP(0.75kw)

Input Voltage :110V/220V/380V,50Hz/60Hz

Nozzle : Auto Shut-off Nozzle

Environmental Condition : -40~~+55degree

Control Type: Solenold Vale Control Type

Preset :Function Provided(Small LCDIndicator)

Display(Counter) :Type LCD and Bright Backlight

Digit of Volume : 0~~999,999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Amount :0~~999,999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Unit price : 0~~9999(4 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Total Range : 0~~99,999,999,99

Optional Display Type: LCD and Bright Backlight

Digit of Volume :0~~99,999,999(8 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Amount :0~~99,999,999(8 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Unit price : 0~~999999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Total Range :0~~99,999,999,99

Totalizer: 1~~9,999,999

Hose :4.5m

Weight :280kg.

Dimension(L×W×H) : 1160*540*1970(mm)

Dimension(L×W×H)Of Qty of Container : 40ft:29

Diagram 3-28: Key command processing flow Article V IC card filling system security Intellectual IC card operation system --- COS 7 intellectual IC card, invented as early as 1968, has another name ---smallest PC (personal computer) from very st fuel dispenser arting. IC card, according to principle of desktop, also needs a set of operating system as platform, that is, COS (Chip Operating System). From the view of its position in intellectual card, it is much more like past DOC in personal computer. COS as core of intellectual card technology, all commands from exterior should be processed in operating system. This system is developed along with integrated circuit card from EEPROM to intellectual card with microprocessor. Comp fuel dispenser ared with general operating system, operating system in card has many traits: address system security; COS is not a universal operating system because it is developed by various manufacturers. Yet, different commercial COS should be designed and developed in line with a basic and general international standard so that make sure the openness of system. Because of adopting unified interface in one factory, different chips may also provide same interface with similar functions. Safety threat and solution to IC card system The security of COS safety protection has integrated many current and matured safety technologies, its reliability lie in the following 3 items: Secrecy: adopt encryption to deal information, preventing illegal store and withdrawal data. Integrality: hinder illegal alteration of information including modification, deletion and increase, etc. A fuel dispenser uthenticity: system has ability to verify the sender and receiver of data, ensuring data valid and authentic. IC card applied system may be attacked during working. Some are by malice, others unconscious. The concrete attack methods are divided into 3 categories: Method I: Fake card, including fabricated card, changing card in operation, etc. Method II: compromised card, employing lost card or larcenous card to conduct operat

LLLVAR ans ...250 Conditional - data required for authorisation e.g.　　 Vehicle Id Odometer reading　　 48-9 Track 2 for second card LLVAR fuel dispenser ns ..37 Conditional - used if captured. Used to specify　　 the second card in a transaction e.g. Loyalty　　 48-10 Track 1 for second card LLVAR ans ..76 Conditional - Not used in Europe　　 48-13 RFID data LLVAR ans ..99 Data received from RFID transponder　　 48-15 Settlement period fuel dispenser n 8 Optional May be booking period number or date　　 48-33 Track 3 for second card LLLVAR ns ..104 Conditional - used if captured. Used to specify　　 the second card in a transaction e.g. Loyalty for　　 those cards where Track 3 is used rather than　　 Track 2.　　 48-37 Vehicle identification entry mode ans 1 Optional - indicates how vehicle identity has　　 been determined　　 48-38 Pump linked indicator n fuel dispenser 1 Optional - indicates the existence of a link　　 between the pump and the payment terminal　　 48-39 Delivery note number n 10 Optional - number allocated by the terminal to　　 the cus

es want to emit more than their limit, they have to buy either extra allowances from other plants, or credits from plants in the developing world that have cut their emissions. This trade in allowances gave birth to the carbon market. It is sizeable an fuel dispenser d growing fast in the first half of 2006, carbon to the value of �2 billion ($15 billion) was traded, five times more than in the same period in 2005. The idea was to screw allowances down over time, thus raising the price of emitting carbon. Unfortunately, the ETS has failed in all its three aims. Emissions were flat before the scheme s introduction in 2005 (largely because manufacturing is moving out of Europe); have been flat since; and, if the European Commissi fuel dispenser on accepts the national plans for handing out allowances put forward for the 2008-12 phase of the scheme, will continue flat. With so many allowances on the market, the price of carbon credits may well collapse and the carbon market fade away. Nor are polluters paying—rather the reverse. In order to get industry to swallow this scheme, allowances were handed out free to companies, rather than being (as economists wanted) auctioned. In power- generation (Europe s most-polluting industry) companies passed the price of carbon credits on to customers and pocketed the value of the allowances. According to a report by IPA Energy Consulting, Britain s power-generators alone made a profit of around £800m ($1.5 billion) from the scheme in its first year. Lastly, the ETS is not leading companies to invest in greener technology. In power, for instance, there has bee fuel dispenser n a boom in coal-fired generation—the dirtiest sort. That is largely because of high gas prices; but the ETS has not been a countervailing force, chiefly because its time-horizons (2005-07, then 2008- 12) are too short for companies to factor the cost of carbon into their investment plans. California would be wrong to conclude from Europe s experience that emissions-trading schemes cannot work. But, as America s succ