
U102-A2 Pumping Unit
Materials:
Body: Aluminum (Spray-Painted)
seals: Buna-N
Technical Specifications:
Power:750-1000W
Flow Rate:45~90L/min
Rotary speed :630~730rpm
Noise: 68db(A)
Minimum. vacuum degree: 0.054Mpa
Pressure Drop: 0.12-0.25Mpa
Separate Ability of Oil and Air: >=20%
Features :
Positive displacement, self priming, internal gear type and adjustable bypass valve.
Designed for quiet, vibration-free operation.
Reusable suction strainer filter at inlet connection.
Reverse check valve at air separator float mechanism.
Check and relief valve at outlet of pumping unit.
100% Factory Tested.
Package:
Product ID Net Weight Cross Weight Dimension
U102-A2 18kg/case of 1 18.5kg/case of 1 36×32× 30cm/case of 1
we are committed to create the best workplace, encourage our staffs to put their own personalities into their jobs, and provide them a stage to show themselves.
come more attractive. So concrete research
continues at a furious pace. Thomas Edison would be proud.
© 2006 .
About sponsorship
Secrets of the digital detectives
Sep 21st 2006
From The Economist print edition
Computing How fraud-detection systems combine doz fuel dispenser ens of clues to spot suspicious patterns
in mountains of transactions
THE pleasure of reading a classic detective story c fuel dispenser omes from the way that the sleuth puts together
several clues to arrive at a surprising conclusion. What is enjoyable is not so much finding out who the
villain is, but hearing the detectives explain their reasoning. Today, not all detectives are human. At
insurance companies, banks and telecoms firms, fraud-detection software is used to comb through
millions of transactions, looking for patterns and spotting fraudulent activity far more quickly and
accurately than any hu fuel dispenser man could. But like human detectives, these software sleuths follow logical rules
and combine disparate pieces of data—and there is something curiously fascinating about the way they
work.
Consider car insurance. Every Monday morning, telephone operators at insurance firms listen to stories of
the weekend s motoring mishaps, typing the answers to several dozen standard questions into their
computers. Once, each claim form then passed to a loss adjuster for approval; now software is
increasingly used instead. The Monday-morning insurance claims, it turns out, are slightly more likely to
be fraudulent than Tuesday claims, since weekends make it easier for policyholders who stage accidents
to assemble friends as false witnesses. A single rule like that is straightforward enough for a human loss
adjuster to take into account. But fraud-detection software can consider dozens of other variables, too.
If a claimant was nearly injured (because of an impact near the driver s seat, for example), the accident
is less likely to have been staged and the claim less like